ReviewMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2024
Cost-effectiveness of Telemedicine Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review.
Review in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One of the most important causes of mortality in the world is acute myocardial infarction. There are two general treatments including thrombolytic drugs and percutaneous coronary interventions. But, monitoring outpatient AMI treatment from a remote or rural location has emerged as a successful telemedicine technique. So, the present study aimed to review the economic evaluation studies of telemedicine in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods: This study was conducted based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist (PRISMA is a 27-item checklist used to improve transparency in systematic reviews) guidelines in 2022. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Proquest, Iranian databases (SID, Magiran), and Google Scholar were searched with the keywords of telemedicine and myocardial infarction from 2000 to 2022. After eliminating duplicates, titles and abstracts were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, details, and the most important results of eligible studies were recorded in the data collection form. Results: 904 records were identified in this search, of which 147 were duplicates. Finally, 6 records were included in this study. Among these studies, 4 were cost-effectiveness, one was cost analysis, and one was cost-utility. The willingness to pay threshold was between 20,000 and 100,000, and the outcomes were measured with QALY (Quality-adjusted life-years). The reviewed studies showed that telemedicine can improve outcomes such as quality of life and reduce disease costs. Conclusion: The results showed that telemedicine interventions for acute myocardial infarction can be helpful, and cost-effective. However in some cases, it can cause increased costs and may not have a significant difference in effectiveness with other methods because of the condition and stage of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.