ReviewJournal of medicine and life2024
Potential challenges to harmonize post-stroke cognitive assessment and its prognostic value: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post-stroke rehabilitation in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: outcome measures, digital tools, and patient education perspectives.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With advances in scientific and clinical knowledge, stroke has evolved from a major cause of death to a chronic condition affecting the daily lives of sufferers, their relatives, and society. Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is common even among individuals with good neurological recovery. When deciding on interventions aimed to improve the life quality of post-stroke patients, identifying those at high risk of cognitive decline proves crucial. Given the complexity of PSCI assessment, this narrative review discusses the feasibility of developing standardized criteria for selecting cognitive instruments. Potential approaches for establishing harmonized procedures for post-stroke cognitive assessment are presented depending on how the cognitive impairment is defined, the cognitive domains examined, the methods used to generalize cognitive data by components/domains, and their normalization against standardized normative samples. The prognostic value of cognitive assessment to identify patients at high risk of PSCI, functional dependence, and poor survival is also discussed. Implementing harmonized criteria for assessing the cognitive status of stroke patients could reduce the now considerable heterogeneity between studies and serve as a reliable basis for determining the prevalence and predicting the occurrence/aggravation of PSCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.