ReviewJournal of medicine and life2024
Optical tweezers in biomedical research - progress and techniques.
Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive Tweezers Based on Differential Hydrophilic-Hydrophobic Surfaces for the Manipulation of Micro-Objects.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Microfluidics for Blood Disorders and Hematological Disease Monitoring and Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Plasma membrane invaginations and their diverse cellular functions.BMC biology · 2026Review
- From single DNA molecule to nanoparticle formation: mechanistic basis for monocationic aromatic drug-induced DNA frameworks.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Strategies to control cellular spatial organization in microphysiological systems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- Characterization of RNA Structure Dynamics with Trans-Factors Using Single-Molecule Optical Tweezers.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical tweezers, which leverage the forces exerted by radiation pressure, have emerged as a pivotal technique for precisely manipulating and analyzing microscopic particles. Since Arthur Ashkin's ground-breaking work in the 1970s and the subsequent development of the single-beam optical trap in 1986, the capabilities of optical tweezers have expanded significantly, enabling the intricate manipulation of biological specimens at the micro- and nanoscale. This review elucidates the foundational principles of optical trapping and their extensive applications in the biomedical sciences. The applications of optical tweezers in biomedicine are vast, ranging from the investigation of cellular mechanical properties, such as cell stretching, membrane elasticity, and stiffness, to single-molecule studies encompassing DNA and protein mechanics, protein-DNA interactions, molecular motor functions, and pathogen-host interactions. Advancement of optical tweezers in this field includes their integration with holography, fluorescence microscopy, microfluidics, and enhancements in force sensitivity and positional accuracy. These tools have profoundly impacted the study of cellular mechanics, drug discovery processes, and disease diagnostics, providing unparalleled insights into the biophysical mechanisms underlying health and pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.