Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781302›Full record

ArticleJournal of rural medicine : JRM2025

Artificial intelligence as a proficient tool in detecting pulmonary tuberculosis in massive population screening programs: a case study in Chennai, India.

Prabakaran Jayaraman, Sangeetha S, Saumit Paul, Richa Pant, Tanveer Gupte, Viraj Kulkarni, Amit Kharat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rural medicine : JRM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prabakaran JayaramanCommunity Medicine, Madha Medical College, India.
Sangeetha SCommunity Medicine, Vinayaka Mission's Kirupananda Variyar Medical College & Hospitals, VMRF(DU) India.
Saumit PaulDeepTek Medical Imaging Pvt. Ltd., India.
Richa PantDeepTek Medical Imaging Pvt. Ltd., India.
Tanveer GupteDeepTek Medical Imaging Pvt. Ltd., India.
Viraj KulkarniDeepTek Medical Imaging Pvt. Ltd., India.
Amit KharatDeepTek Medical Imaging Pvt. Ltd., India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of Genki, a computer-aided detection (CADe) software, in detecting tuberculosis (TB) using chest radiography in a mobile TB screening program in Chennai, India. Materials and Methods: Genki, an AI-based CADe software, was employed in four mobile diagnostic units in remote areas of Chennai, India for screening TB. Patients from remote areas of Chennai who visited the vans and registered in the screening program underwent chest radiography, and the acquired X-ray scans were analyzed using Genki, which provided an assessment of each scan as either "TB suggestive" or "TB not suggestive". Subsequently, sputum or swab from the patients with "TB suggestive" results was collected to confirm the diagnosis. Results: In total, 25,598 patients were screened between January and December 2022. When the annotations from the expert radiologists were considered to be true, Genki demonstrated an aggregated sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 96.9%, and accuracy of 96.9% in detecting TB from chest X-ray scans of the screened population. Furthermore, it exhibited a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of >95%, >94%, and >94%, respectively, for both sexes (male and female) and all age groups (14-35, 36-60, and ≥61 years). Conclusion: Genki demonstrated excellent value as a TB screening tool in remote locations in Chennai, India. Employing a CADe-based approach for systematic TB screening is cost-effective and reduces workload in high-burden and low-resource settings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer-aided detectionGenkituberculosisx-ray

Identifiers

PMID39781302
PMCPMC11704598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.