Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781270›Full record

ArticleFood & nutrition research2024

An overview of approaches for assessing the environmental sustainability of diets - a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023.

Tim G Benton, Helen Harwatt, Anne Høyer-Lund, Helle Margrete Meltzer, Ellen Trolle, Rune Blomhoff

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Food & nutrition research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tim G BentonRoyal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London, UK.
Helen HarwattRoyal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London, UK.
Anne Høyer-LundThe Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, Norway.
Helle Margrete MeltzerDivision of Climate and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Ellen TrolleNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Rune BlomhoffThe Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the environmental impacts of food, food systems and diets is highly complex due to the multitude of processes involved, the uncertainty in assessment models, the variability in production systems and the large range of products available. No single assessment method alone can provide a complete evidence base. The increasing number of Life Cycle Assessment and food system analyses, and more recently the integration of planetary boundaries offer insights from which we can draw some robust high-level conclusions, whilst recognising there is a need for more detailed analysis to capture the inherent nuances of more location and context-specific situations. Despite the complexity of assessing the environmental sustainability of food, diets and food systems, there are a number of key considerations that could be used to guide this process, and in doing so, they help to increase utility of the outcomes and limit unintended adverse consequences. We identified five key considerations that can be applied (consider the thresholds, consider the system, consider the variables, consider the context and consider the spillover) to ensure assessments are comprehensive.

Indexed as

dietary guidelinesenvironmental impactsfood systemssustainable food systems

Identifiers

PMID39781270
PMCPMC11708501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.