Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781214›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in future transportation2023

A Novel Vision Zero Leadership Training Model to Support Collaboration and Strategic Action Planning.

Rebecca B Naumann, Seth LaJeunesse, Elyse Keefe, Stephen Heiny, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Ki'yonna Jones, Kelly R Evenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in future transportation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca B NaumannInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Seth LaJeunesseHighway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Elyse KeefeInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Stephen HeinyHighway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Kristen Hassmiller LichDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Ki'yonna JonesNorth Carolina Institute for Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Kelly R EvensonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE001495NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE003092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While collaboration and cooperation are regarded as foundational to Vision Zero (VZ) and Safe Systems initiatives, there is little guidance on structuring VZ collaboration, conducting collaborative goal setting, and aligning tangible action across organizations. As part of a larger VZ mutual learning model, we developed a VZ Leadership Team Institute to support communities in collaborative VZ strategic planning and goal setting. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and evaluation of the Institute, which can serve as a foundation for other initiatives seeking to move VZ planning and implementation forward in a collaborative, systems-aware manner. In June 2021, eight multi-disciplinary teams of 3-6 persons each (n=42 participants) attended the Institute, representing leaders from communities of various sizes. Surveys were administered pre, immediately post, and six months following the Institute. We measured confidence in a range of skills (on a 5-point scale, 1: not confident to 5: very confident). The largest increases in confidence from pre- to immediately post-Institute were for collaboratively drafting objectives and actions for VZ goals (pre-mean:2.6, SD:0.9 to post-mean:3.8, SD:0.9); incorporating equity into goals (pre-mean:2.8, SD:1.0 to post-mean:3.9, SD:0.8); and knowing how to keep VZ planning and implementation efforts on track (pre-mean:2.6, SD:1.0 to post-mean:3.7, SD:0.7). For all measures, average confidence in skills decreased from immediately post-Institute to six months post-Institute, but remained greater than average scores pre-Institute. Surveys also measured coalition collaboration pre-Institute and six months post-Institute (on a 4-point scale, 1: strongly disagree to 4: strongly agree). Several measures maintained high agreement across time, and mean agreement increased for reporting that the future direction of the coalition was clearly communicated to everyone (pre-mean:2.6, SD:0.8; six months post-mean:3.1, SD:0.4) and decreased for feeling like the coalition had adequate staffing (pre-mean:3.0, SD:0.6; six months post-mean:2.3, SD:0.5). The Institute utilized innovative content, tools, and examples to support VZ coalitions' collaborative and systems-aware planning and implementation processes. As communities work toward zero transportation deaths and serious injuries, providing effective support models to aid multidisciplinary planning and action around a Safe Systems approach will be important to accelerate progress toward a safer transportation system.

Indexed as

action plancoalitioncollaborationinjury preventionroad safetySafe Systemstransportation planningVision Zero

Identifiers

PMID39781214
PMCPMC11708305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.