Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781200›Full record

ReviewMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2024

Endovascular interventions in cancer patients with compromise of the mediastinal vasculature: a review.

Steven Yevich, Nicolas Cardenas, Rahul Sheth, Joshua Kuban, Milan Patel, Ketan Shah, Koustav Pal, Stephen R Chen, Alda Tam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steven YevichDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8313-7568
Nicolas CardenasDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Rahul ShethDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Joshua KubanDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Milan PatelDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ketan ShahDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Koustav PalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Stephen R ChenDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Alda TamDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mediastinal vasculature can be affected by various etiologies in cancer patients. Both direct and indirect sequela of cancer may result in life-threatening clinical presentations. Tumor growth may cause vessel narrowing and decreased blood flow from either extrinsic mass effect, invasion into the vascular wall, or tumor thrombus within the lumen. In addition, cancer patients are predisposed to indirect sequela to the mediastinal vasculature from an increased risk of benign thromboembolic events, tumor thrombus, or iatrogenic complications during cancer treatments. Benign thrombus may result in partial or complete occlusion of the superior vena cava (SVC) or pulmonary artery. Vascular damage such as pseudoaneurysm or stricture may result from iatrogenic complications from radiation therapy, surgery, or other interventions. The clinical presentation of the vascular compromise is dictated by the vascular anatomical structure that is affected and the type of injury. In the appropriate clinical scenario, endovascular treatments may be pursued. These minimally invasive procedures include balloon venoplasty and angioplasty, stent placement, catheter-directed thrombolysis, embolectomy, and embolization. This review discusses the most common endovascular interventions for vascular compromise based on the great vessel affected: the SVC, pulmonary artery, pulmonary vein, bronchial arteries, or the aorta and supra-aortic arteries. Indications for treatment are discussed, with particular attention to disease etiology and clinical presentation.

Indexed as

embolismpseudoaneurysmstenosisStentthrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID39781200
PMCPMC11707439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.