Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781196›Full record

ReviewMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2024

Managing recurrent thymic epithelial tumors after resection: outcomes and role of re-resection.

Tetsuya Mizuno, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tetsuya MizunoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-YoshikawaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare neoplasms that include thymomas, thymic carcinomas (TCs), and thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms (TNENs). These three tumor categories differ in aggressiveness, the incidence of recurrence after resection, the pattern of recurrence, and survival outcomes. Owing to the tumor's rarity, randomized trials have not been performed in the initial treatment setting. Furthermore, such trials have never been performed in recurrent cases after the initial resection. Thymomas have indolent characteristics, with a wide range of biological spectra compared to TCs and TNENs; therefore, several authors have reported favorable outcomes after re-resection for recurrent thymomas. Common recurrent sites are the local site and pleura, and recurrent disease progresses slowly after detection. Additionally, long-term survivors are sometimes observed after recurrence, and whether re-resections contribute to post-recurrent and cause-specific survival remains unclear. Multimodal therapies are indicated in patients with locally or regionally advanced recurrence, similar to those performed in the initial treatment settings. TCs and TNENs exhibit more aggressive behavior than thymomas. Surgical resection was performed on selected patients who experienced recurrence. Currently, there are no guidelines on selecting patients for re-resection. Therefore, it is most likely that each physician selects based on favorable factors, including the extent of disease, disease-free intervals, and histology. No evidence of nonsurgical treatments, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, has yet to be established. This review article summarizes the limited evidence on managing recurrent TETs after resection compared to thymomas, TCs, and TNENs, focusing on re-resection.

Indexed as

recurrencere-resectionThymic epithelial tumors (TETs)

Identifiers

PMID39781196
PMCPMC11707442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.