Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781184›Full record

ArticleThe journal of poultry science2025

Biosecurity Practices for Reducing Antimicrobial Use in Commercial Broiler Farms in Korea.

Min Beom Kim, Young Ju Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Min Beom KimCollege of Veterinary Medicine & Institute for Veterinary Biomedical Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41556, Republic of Korea.
Young Ju LeeCollege of Veterinary Medicine & Institute for Veterinary Biomedical Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41556, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farm biosecurity is valuable for reducing the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials. However, its relationship with antimicrobial usage can be difficult to assess because of multiple factors. This study evaluated the impact of biosecurity practices on productivity, frequency of antimicrobial use, and development of antimicrobial resistance. Among factors related to biosecurity, mortality rate <2% within one week of age, survival rate >98%, and production index >350 in farms in which: bedding was not reused or only reused once, regular advice and biosecurity training was provided by poultry veterinarians, distinctions between clean and dirty areas were strictly enforced at all times, workers used farm biosecurity manuals, or disinfection guidelines were fully implemented, including cleaning before introducing new flocks and daily disinfection throughout growth, were significantly higher than those in farms without these measures (

Indexed as

antimicrobial-resistant bacteriaantimicrobialsbiosecurity practicesbroiler

Identifiers

PMID39781184
PMCPMC11700789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.