ReviewCureus2024
The Impact of Stone Composition on Treatment Strategies for Patients with Urolithiasis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The durability and effectiveness of hydrogel retrieval method for urinary stone fragments: an in-vitro study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Biochemical composition and demographic distribution of kidney stones: a hospital-based cross-sectional study in Eastern Nepal.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Metabolic Insights From Composition-Based Analysis of Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study of 506 Patients.Cureus · 2026Article
- Associations of metabolic syndrome and its components with complex renal calculi and stone composition: a cross-sectional study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Association Between Stone Composition and Recurrence Rates Following Ureteroscopy: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urolithiasis is a multifactorial condition where stone composition is critical in guiding treatment and prevention strategies. Advanced diagnostic techniques, such as infrared spectroscopy, provide precise stone analysis, enabling clinicians to tailor interventions based on specific stone types and associated metabolic abnormalities. Calcium oxalate monohydrate stones often require invasive approaches like percutaneous nephrolithotomy, while uric acid responds well to dissolution therapy. Cystine stones, linked to genetic cystinuria, necessitate lifelong management, including aggressive hydration, urinary alkalinization, and pharmacological treatments such as tiopronin. Stone composition significantly influences treatment decisions and recurrence prevention in urolithiasis. Integrating detailed compositional analysis into clinical practice enables personalized interventions, improving outcomes and reducing recurrence rates. Future research should focus on refining diagnostic techniques and exploring novel therapies to address the metabolic and environmental contributors to stone formation. Adopting a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach is essential for advancing the management of urolithiasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.