Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781117›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Comparative Evaluation of Apical Leakage in Root Canal Obturation Using AH Plus Sealer, Bioceramic Sealer, and Bioceramic Sealer Incorporated With Chitosan Nanoparticles: An In Vitro Study.

Sushmita Rane, Varsha Pandit, Sanpreet S Sachdev, Shivani Chauhan, Rishabh Mistry, Barun Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gold Nanoparticles and Chitosan Nanoparticles: A Systematic Review.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sushmita RaneConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Varsha PanditConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Sanpreet S SachdevOral Pathology and Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Shivani ChauhanConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Rishabh MistryDentistry, D.Y. Patil (Deemed to be University) School of Dentistry, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Barun KumarOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Endodontic re-infections primarily occur due to the ingress of bacteria and their toxins through an incomplete seal following obturation. A variety of sealers have been developed to achieve effective integration with the different obturation materials and dentinal tubules. To choose the right endodontic sealer and application for each clinical instance, one must be aware of the attributes of the various sealers commonly used in clinical practice. The utility of chitosan nanoparticles in endodontics requires exploration to understand the faring of this material in comparison to the existing gold standards. This study aims to compare the apical leakage after obturation using AH Plus sealer and bioceramic sealer with and without chitosan nanoparticles. Materials and methods Forty single-rooted, single-canal extracted teeth were selected and decoronated to standardize the root length to 14 mm. Root canals were prepared using Protaper rotary files and irrigated with sodium hypochlorite, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and saline. The samples were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): group I (gutta percha), group II (gutta percha + AH Plus sealer), group III (gutta percha + bioceramic sealer), and group IV (gutta percha + chitosan nanoparticles in bioceramic sealer). The sealers were applied, and obturation was performed using the cold lateral condensation technique. Post-obturation, the samples were sealed with Cavit-G, coated with nail varnish, and immersed in 2% methylene blue dye for 72 hours. The teeth were then sectioned longitudinally and inspected for dye penetration using a stereomicroscope. Results The mean dye penetration values were as follows: 4.77 ± 2.08 mm in group I, 2.93 ± 0.40 mm in group II, 2.34 ± 1.46 mm in group III, and 1.93 ± 1.68 mm in group IV. Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between the groups. Tukey's post hoc test revealed the least microleakage in group IV, indicating superior sealing ability of bioceramic sealer with chitosan nanoparticles. Conclusion Incorporation of chitosan nanoparticles in bioceramic sealer significantly enhances its sealing ability, reducing apical microleakage more effectively than gutta percha (2.5 times), AH Plus sealer (1.5 times), and bioceramic sealer alone (1.2 times). This suggests that chitosan nanoparticles could be a promising addition to endodontic sealers to improve treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

apical leakagebioceramic sealerchitosan nanoparticlesendodontic re-infectionsmicroleakageobturationresin sealerroot canal sealers

Identifiers

PMID39781117
PMCPMC11707632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.