ArticleJOR spine2025
Posterior Ligamentum Complex Preservation Alleviate ASD-Related Biomechanical Deterioration in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Models: A Finite Element Analysis.
Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical advances in oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion using different interbody cages.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Modified Spinous Process-Splitting Approach for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures With Neurological Deficits: Technical Description and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Single-Side Iatrogenic Pedicle Injury May Trigger an Increased Risk of Contralateral Screw Loosening: An In Silico Study.JOR spine · 2025Article
- Quantitative assessment of lumbar posterior anatomy on axial t2-weighted MR imaging: a comprehensive analysis of muscle-bone interval and spinous process muscle-ligaments complex.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are differences in the extent of excision of articular processes, spinal processes and posterior ligamentum complexes (PLC) for posterior approach lumbar interbody fusion. Given that the biomechanical significance of these structures has been verified and that deterioration of the biomechanical environment is the main trigger for complications in both fused and adjacent motion segments, changes in decompression ranges may affect the potential risk of adjacent segmental disease (ASD) biomechanically; however, this topic has yet to be identified. Methods: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with different decompression strategies was simulated in a well-validated lumbosacral model. The excision and preservation of the cranial motion of the segmental PLC and the lateral articular process in the fusion segment were simulated in this model. The stress distribution in the cranial motion segment was computed under different loading conditions to determine the potential risk of ASD. Results: Compared to complete bilateral articular process excision, preservation of the lateral two-thirds of the articular process did not alleviate stress concentration on the cranial motion segment both in PLC preserved and excised models. In contrast, preservation of the cranial segmental PLC can obviously alleviate the stress concentration tendency of the cranial intervertebral disc under flexion loading conditions. Conclusion: Preservation of the lateral parts of the articular process cannot optimize the biomechanical environment, in contrast, PLC preservation can effectively alleviate ASD related biomechanical deterioration of the cranium segment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.