ArticleF&S reports2024
Artificial removal of the zona pellucida at the pronuclear stage: an exploratory study to improve embryo fragmentation.
Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An Updated Understanding of Human Embryonic Fragmentation.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Pooled it
- Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether artificial removal of zona pellucida (ZP) at the pronuclear stage improves good-quality embryos and blastocyst development in patients with difficulty conceiving because of severe fragmentation in early-cleavage stage. Design: Exploratory investigation. Setting: Reproductive center. Patients: Thirty-four patients scheduled for assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment in our clinic between February 2020 and January 2021 were selected to undergo ZP removal according to their ART-related medical history. In total, 173 two pronuclei zygotes were obtained, with 101 allocated to the ZP-free group and 72 to the ZP-intact group. All patients had zygotes allocated in both ZP-free and ZP-intact groups. Interventions: Oocytes that were confirmed to be normally fertilized were placed in sucrose-containing HEPES medium for approximately 5 minutes and cultured under one of the following two conditions: ZP-free, in which the ZP was completely removed from the ooplasm by laser irradiation and a medium-blowing method with a biopsy pipette; and ZP-intact. Subsequently, embryos were either freshly transferred on day 2 (ZP-intact group only, according to patients' wishes), or day 5/6, or they were cryopreserved on day 5/6/7 for future embryo transfer cycles for both groups. Main Outcome Measures: Rates of good-quality embryos, blastocyst development, morphologically good-quality blastocyst development, and cryopreservation. Results: In ZP-free embryos, the inter-blastomere adhesion was not disturbed and the fragmentation was significantly decreased that resulted into significant improvement in all measured parameters compared with the ZP-intact group. Conclusions: Artificial ZP removal at the pronuclear stage may prevent excessive fragmentation leading to good-quality blastocysts. Moreover, patients with recurrent ART failure may achieve successful pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.