ArticleF&S reports2024
Fresh vs. frozen: pregnancy outcomes and treatment efficacy between fresh embryo transfer vs. untested freeze-all cycles.
Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Versus Morphological Selection in Women Aged 35-42: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- No need to freeze everything: Are we striking the right balance in fertility treatments?F&S reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare pregnancy outcomes after single blastocyst embryo transfer among patients whose first autologous embryo transfer was either a fresh embryo transfer or a frozen embryo transfer (FET) after a freeze-all, in the absence of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Design: A multicenter retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: National multicenter fertility practice. Patients: A total of 8,319 autologous first blastocyst embryo transfers in the absence of PGT-A were analyzed. Of them, 6,755 transfers were fresh embryo transfer (ET) and 1,564 transfers were FET after freeze-all. Exposure: Patients underwent either a fresh or a frozen initial autologous, single blastocyst transfer in the absence of PGT-A. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measure was live birth rate. Secondary outcome measures included positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate. Results: Live birth rate was comparable between the fresh ET and FET groups in the absence of PGT-A, after performing generalized estimating equation modeling to account for age, body mass index, antral follicle count, basal follicle-stimulating hormone, progesterone on day of trigger/day of final lining check, peak estradiol during in vitro fertilization stimulation cycle, number of oocytes retrieved during ovarian stimulation cycle, and primary diagnosis. Similarly, the secondary outcome variables of positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rates were comparable between the cohorts. These findings were observed in the entire study group, within each age category of <35, 35-37, 38-40, and >40 and among each stratified peak estradiol group. Conclusions: In the absence of PGT-A, patients and fertility providers can elect to pursue either fresh ET or embryo freeze-all with subsequent FET during the first autologous in vitro fertilization cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.