ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2025
Brain-inspired learning rules for spiking neural network-based control: a tutorial.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Life Cells for future energy systems: adaptation, evolution and exploration.National science review · 2026Review
- SpikeAEC: a neuromodulation-based spiking controller for explore-exploit balancing in mobile robots.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic systems rely on spatio-temporal information to solve control tasks. With advancements in deep neural networks, reinforcement learning has significantly enhanced the performance of control tasks by leveraging deep learning techniques. However, as deep neural networks grow in complexity, they consume more energy and introduce greater latency. This complexity hampers their application in robotic systems that require real-time data processing. To address this issue, spiking neural networks, which emulate the biological brain by transmitting spatio-temporal information through spikes, have been developed alongside neuromorphic hardware that supports their operation. This paper reviews brain-inspired learning rules and examines the application of spiking neural networks in control tasks. We begin by exploring the features and implementations of biologically plausible spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Subsequently, we investigate the integration of a global third factor with spike-timing-dependent plasticity and its utilization and enhancements in both theoretical and applied research. We also discuss a method for locally applying a third factor that sophisticatedly modifies each synaptic weight through weight-based backpropagation. Finally, we review studies utilizing these learning rules to solve control tasks using spiking neural networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.