ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025
Spinal tissue identification using a Forward-oriented endoscopic ultrasound technique.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: A Review of Perception, Decision, and Execution Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of a deep learning-based MRI diagnostic model for human Brucella spondylitis.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The limited imaging depth of optical endoscope restrains the identification of tissues under surface during the minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), thus increasing the risk of critical tissue damage. This study is proposed to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of automatic spinal soft tissue identification using a forward-oriented ultrasound endoscopic system. Total 758 ex-vivo soft tissue samples were collected from ovine spines to create a dataset with four categories including spinal cord, nucleus pulposus, adipose tissue, and nerve root. Three conventional methods including Gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), Empirical Wavelet Transform (EWT), Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) and two deep-learning based methods including Densely Connected Neural Network (DenseNet) model, one-dimensional Vision Transformer (ViT) model, were applied to identify the spinal tissues. The two deep learning methods outperformed the conventional methods with both accuracy over 95%. Especially the signal-based method (ViT) achieved an accuracy of 98.31% and a specificity of 99.2%, and the inference latency was only 0.0025 s. It illustrated the feasibility of applying the forward-oriented ultrasound endoscopic system for real-time intraoperative recognition of critical spinal tissues to enhance the precision and safety of minimally invasive spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.