ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025
Orthopedic surgeon level joint angle assessment with artificial intelligence based on photography: a pilot study.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating patient progress. Traditional manual goniometry often lacks precision and is subject to inter-observer variability, especially in measuring shoulder internal rotation (IR). This study introduces an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach that uses clinical photography to improve the accuracy of ROM quantification. We analyzed a total of 150 clinical photographs, including 100 shoulder and 50 elbow images, taken between January and April 2022. An MMPose model with an HR-NET backbone architecture, pre-trained on the COCO-WholeBody dataset, was used to detect 17 anatomical landmarks. A random forest classifier (PoseRF) then categorized poses, and ROM angles were calculated. Concurrently, two clinicians independently measured shoulder IR at the vertebral level, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated. Linear regression analyses were conducted to correlate the AI-derived measurements with the clinicians' assessments. The AI-based algorithm accurately detected anatomical landmarks in 96% of shoulder and 100% of elbow images. Pose detection achieved 95% accuracy overall, with 100% accuracy for specific shoulder (abduction, flexion, external rotation) and elbow (flexion, extension) poses. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the AI algorithm and human observers ranged from 0.965 to 0.997, indicating excellent inter-observer reliability. Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant differences in ROM measurements among the AI algorithm and two human observers across all joint angles ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.