Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781060›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025

Orthopedic surgeon level joint angle assessment with artificial intelligence based on photography: a pilot study.

Seung Min Ryu, Keewon Shin, Chang Hyun Doh, Hui Ben, Ji Yeon Park, Kyoung-Hwan Koh, Hangsik Shin, In-Ho Jeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seung Min Ryu *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, 02053, South Korea.
Keewon Shin *Department of Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.
Chang Hyun DohDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505 South Korea.
Hui BenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505 South Korea.
Ji Yeon ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505 South Korea.
Kyoung-Hwan KohDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505 South Korea.
Hangsik Shin *Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505 South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3353-0310
In-Ho Jeon *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505 South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating patient progress. Traditional manual goniometry often lacks precision and is subject to inter-observer variability, especially in measuring shoulder internal rotation (IR). This study introduces an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach that uses clinical photography to improve the accuracy of ROM quantification. We analyzed a total of 150 clinical photographs, including 100 shoulder and 50 elbow images, taken between January and April 2022. An MMPose model with an HR-NET backbone architecture, pre-trained on the COCO-WholeBody dataset, was used to detect 17 anatomical landmarks. A random forest classifier (PoseRF) then categorized poses, and ROM angles were calculated. Concurrently, two clinicians independently measured shoulder IR at the vertebral level, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated. Linear regression analyses were conducted to correlate the AI-derived measurements with the clinicians' assessments. The AI-based algorithm accurately detected anatomical landmarks in 96% of shoulder and 100% of elbow images. Pose detection achieved 95% accuracy overall, with 100% accuracy for specific shoulder (abduction, flexion, external rotation) and elbow (flexion, extension) poses. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the AI algorithm and human observers ranged from 0.965 to 0.997, indicating excellent inter-observer reliability. Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant differences in ROM measurements among the AI algorithm and two human observers across all joint angles ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical photographyElbowGoniometryPose estimationRange of motionShoulder

Identifiers

PMID39781060
PMCPMC11703788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.