ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025
A high performance heterogeneous hardware architecture for brain computer interface.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) has been widely used in human-computer interaction. The introduction of artificial intelligence has further improved the performance of BCI system. In recent years, the development of BCI has gradually shifted from personal computers to embedded devices, which boasts lower power consumption and smaller size, but at the cost of limited device resources and computing speed, thus can hardly improve the support of complex algorithms. This paper proposes a heterogeneous BCI architecture based on ARM + FPGA, enabling real-time processing of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Adopting data quantization, layer fusion and data augmentation to optimize the compact neural network model EEGNet, and design dedicated hardware engines to accelerate the network. Experimental results show that the system achieves 93.3% classification accuracy for steady-state visual evoked potential signals, with a time delay of 0.2 ms per trail, and a power consumption of approximately (1.91 W). That is 31.5 times faster acceleration is realized at the cost of only 0.7% lower accuracy compared with the conventional processor. The results show that the BCI architecture proposed in this study has strong practicability and high research significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.