Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781035›Full record

Reviewnpj antimicrobials and resistance2025

The role of gene copy number variation in antimicrobial resistance in human fungal pathogens.

Adarsh Jay, David F Jordan, Aleeza Gerstein, Christian R Landry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj antimicrobials and resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adarsh Jay *Département de Biochimie, de Microbiologie et de Bio-informatique, Faculté des Sciences et de Génie, Université Laval, Québec City, G1V 0A6 Canada.
David F Jordan *Département de Biochimie, de Microbiologie et de Bio-informatique, Faculté des Sciences et de Génie, Université Laval, Québec City, G1V 0A6 Canada.
Aleeza GersteinDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, R3T 2N2 Canada.
Christian R LandryDépartement de Biochimie, de Microbiologie et de Bio-informatique, Faculté des Sciences et de Génie, Université Laval, Québec City, G1V 0A6 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faced with the burden of increasing resistance to antifungals in many fungal pathogens and the constant emergence of new drug-resistant strains, it is essential to assess the importance of various resistance mechanisms. Fungi have relatively plastic genomes and can tolerate genomic copy number variation (CNV) caused by aneuploidy and gene amplification or deletion. In many cases, these genomic changes lead to adaptation to stressful conditions, including those caused by antifungal drugs. Here, we specifically examine the contribution of CNVs to antifungal resistance. We undertook a thorough literature search, collecting reports of antifungal resistance caused by a CNV, and classifying the examples of CNV-conferred resistance into four main mechanisms. We find that in human fungal pathogens, there is little evidence that gene copy number plays a major role in the emergence of antifungal resistance compared to other types of mutations. We discuss why we might be underestimating their importance and new approaches being used to study them.

Indexed as

AntimicrobialsExperimental evolutionFungiMolecular evolutionPopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID39781035
PMCPMC11703754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.