Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39780972›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

One and only SNARC? Spatial-Numerical Associations are not fully flexible and depend on both relative and absolute number magnitude.

Lilly Roth, John Caffier, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Annika Tave Overlander, Krzysztof Cipora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lilly RothDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2690-0504
John CaffierDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-9167
Ulf-Dietrich ReipsDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1566-4745
Hans-Christoph NuerkDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-7498
Annika Tave OverlanderDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8373-4086
Krzysztof CiporaCentre for Mathematical Cognition, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0077-9336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numbers are associated with space, but it is unclear how flexible these associations are. We investigated whether the SNARC effect (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes; Dehaene

Indexed as

flexibilitymental number linereplicationSNARC effectSpatial-Numerical Associations

Identifiers

PMID39780972
PMCPMC11709453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.