ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2024
Reoperation Rate Following Thumb Basal Joint Arthroplasty: A Minimum Follow-Up Period of 5 Years.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Revision Thumb CMC Arthroplasty.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Thumb basal joint arthroplasty (BJA) performed for thumb basal joint arthritis is associated with high patient satisfaction. However, complications requiring reoperation occur, with a previously reported early reoperation rate (within 2 years) of 1.5%. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of and reasons for reoperation in the intermediate term, defined as within 5 years of the index surgery. Methods: All cases of primary thumb BJA performed from 2014 to 2016 at a single private academic center were reviewed. For cases requiring reoperation, data regarding index surgical technique, reason for reoperation, time to reoperation, and reoperation technique were collected. Risk of reoperation (return to the operating room for any reason) and risk of revision arthroplasty (revision surgery for symptomatic subsidence or instability) within 5 years of the index surgery were calculated. Results: A total of 686 primary thumb BJAs were performed in 637 patients. Risk of reoperation for any reason was 2.0% (14/686), and risk of revision arthroplasty for symptomatic subsidence or instability was 0.6% (4/686) within 5 years of surgery. The mean time between the index surgery and reoperation was 10.3 months (range, 16 days to 4.6 years) for all cases; however, for revision arthroplasty, the mean time was 9.6 months (range, 3.9-14.3 months). Conclusions: The intermediate term (5 years minimum) rate of reoperation following thumb BJA for any reason was 2%, with only approximately one-fourth of reoperation cases requiring revision arthroplasty for symptomatic subsidence or instability. These data may provide useful information in the counseling of patients considering thumb BJA surgery. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.