ReviewNagoya journal of medical science2024
Association between combined use of epidural analgesia and oxytocin administration during labor and offspring outcomes: a narrative review and proposal.
Review in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies have suggested that the administration of epidural analgesia (Epi) and oxytocin (OT) during labor affects offspring outcomes. However, the effects of their combined use remain unclear. This article aimed to review the outcomes of offspring exposed to Epi and OT, identify research gaps, and discuss future research directions. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies describing offspring outcomes in the Epi, OT, Epi-OT, and control groups. We included one systematic review, six cohort studies, and one case-control study. The offspring outcomes at birth did not differ between the Epi-OT and Epi groups. In the first hour of life, the pre-feeding and sucking behaviors of the Epi-OT group showed an inverse correlation. At 2 days of age, the breastfeeding behavior and skin temperature patterns differed significantly between the Epi-OT and other groups. At 4 days of age, hyperbilirubinemia was more prevalent in the Epi-OT versus control group. Behavioral scores at 1 month differed little among the Epi-OT, Epi, and control groups. No eligible studies examined 1 month to 1 year of life. From 1 to >13 years of age, the risk of autism spectrum disorder was higher in the Epi and Epi-OT groups versus the control group. Most eligible studies were small and observational without randomization, and the results were inconsistent. Additional large cohort studies of various aspects of offspring development are required to assess the long-term effects of Epi-OT administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.