ArticleJTCVS open2024
Association between the proportionality of functional mitral regurgitation and survival after mitral valve operation.
Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The concept of proportionate and disproportionate functional mitral regurgitation suggests that transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral repair may benefit patients with a smaller left ventricle relative to a higher regurgitant burden. The clinical relevance of proportionality remains unknown in mitral operations for ischemic mitral regurgitation. We aimed to characterize the association between mitral regurgitation proportionality and outcomes after mitral valve operations. Methods: By using the Cardiothoracic Surgery Trial Network's severe ischemic mitral regurgitation trial, we first identified the inflection point at which the risk of 2-year mortality changed along the spectrum of the mitral regurgitation proportionality (defined as effective regurgitant orifice area/left ventricular end-diastolic volume index) using a splined multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Patients were dichotomized by the mitral regurgitation proportionality value. The Cox model evaluated the hazard of 2-year all-cause mortality between proportionate and disproportionate mitral regurgitation. Results: Among the 240 patients, the median age was 69 years (interquartile range, 62-75), and 38% (n = 90) were women. Patients with effective regurgitant orifice/left ventricular end-diastolic volume index proportion greater than 0.40 (more disproportionate mitral regurgitation) had a higher hazard of death compared with those with more proportionate mitral regurgitation. The 90-day and 1-year mortality were higher in patients with disproportionate mitral regurgitation (13% vs 6.2% for 90 days and 19% vs 12% for 1 year). In a multivariable Cox model, the disproportionate mitral regurgitation group had a statistically significantly higher hazard of death compared with the proportionate mitral regurgitation group (hazard ratio, 2.15, 95% CI, 1.16-3.98, Conclusions: The clinical relevance of the proportionality of functional mitral regurgitation proposed in the transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral repair population may not generalize to surgical patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.