ArticleJTCVS open2024
Machine learning-derived multivariable predictors of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.
Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiogenic Shock Detection Using Electronic Medical Records: A Review and Blueprint for Clinical Implementation and Future Research.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- High-Granularity Machine Learning Prediction of Acute Brain Injury in Patients Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative hepatic dysfunction in Stanford type A aortic dissection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advocating MiECC: Proven benefits for high-risk cardiac surgery patients based on COMICS trial evidence.JTCVS open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a model for preoperatively predicting postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) in patients with poor left ventricular (LV) function undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database, 11,493 patients with LV ejection fraction ≤35% underwent isolated on-pump surgery from 2018 through 2019, of whom 3428 experienced PCCS. In total, 68 preoperative clinical variables were considered in machine-learning algorithms trained and optimized using scikit-learn software. Results: Compared with patients with ideal recovery, those that did were younger (65 vs 67 years), more likely female, Black, with low LV ejection fraction (26.5 vs 28.9%), previous myocardial infarction, chronic lung disease, diabetes, reoperation, or advanced heart failure. Among those with PCCS versus ideal recovery, operative mortality was 27% (925/3428) versus 0.1% (5/8065). PCCS occurred more often after coronary artery bypass grafting with concomitant mitral valve repair or after longer perfusion and clamp times. Reliable preoperative PCCS predictors were more advanced cardiac, liver, and renal failure; frailty; and greater white cell count. Out of sample test set receiver operating curve achieved an area under the curve of 0.74 with acceptable calibration Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic χ Conclusions: In patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery, risk of PCCS is elevated by preoperative failure of other organ systems and complexity of the planned operation that prolongs myocardial ischemia and cardiopulmonary bypass. This risk calculator could serve as an important tool to preoperatively identify patients in need of advanced levels of support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.