ArticleJTCVS open2024
Predicting operative mortality in patients who undergo elective open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of failure to rescue in adult patients who undergo open, proximal aortic repair.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Shift in Patient Demographics of Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Patients in the Endovascular Era.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Management and outcomes of thoracic dissection in older adults.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2025Review
- The development of the Siena graft.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We have developed a model aimed at identifying preoperative predictors of operative mortality in patients who undergo elective, open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. We converted this model into an intuitive nomogram to aid preoperative counseling. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 2884 elective, open TAAA repairs performed between 1986 and 2023 in a single practice. Using clinical and selected operative variables, we built 4 predictive models: multivariable logistic regression (MLR), random forest, support vector machine, and gradient boosting machine. Each model's predictive effectiveness was evaluated with the C-statistic. Test C-statistics were computed using an 80:20 cross-validation scheme with 1000 iterations. Results: Operative death occurred in 200 patients (6.9%). Test set C-statistics showed that the MLR model (median, 0.68; interquartile range [IQR], 0.65-0.71) outperformed the machine learning models (0.61 [IQR, 0.59-0.64] for random forest; 0.61 [IQR, 0.58-0.64] for support vector machine; 0.65 [IQR, 0.62-0.67] for gradient boosting machine). The final MLR model was based on 7 characteristics: increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04/y; Conclusions: Using institutional data, we evaluated several models to predict operative mortality in elective TAAA repair, using information available to surgeons preoperatively. We then converted the best predictive model, the MLR model, into an intuitive nomogram to aid patient counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.