ArticleJTCVS open2024
Outcomes after open repair of aortic aneurysms and dissections in cannabis consumers.
Article in JTCVS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the influence of cannabis consumption on the mid- and long-term surgical outcomes of patients with aortic aneurysms or dissections. Methods: All individuals aged 18 years and older with more than 6 months of cannabis use at the time of surgical repair for cardiovascular disease (aortic aneurysms or aortic dissection) between 2007 and 2023 were eligible. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on their preoperative history of cannabis use: cannabis users and noncannabis users. The primary end point was complications or death within 30 days of intervention. Secondary outcomes included late complications and reinterventions. Data were combined from our institution and inpatient hospital records. Results: We identified 134 patients who met the inclusion criteria out of 1543 treated patients (9%). Compared with the nonusing cannabis group, individuals in the cannabis group were significantly younger (cannabis: 48.3 ± 11.8 years vs noncannabis: 58.5 ± 14.9 years; Conclusions: The increased rates of postoperative cerebrovascular accidents and respiratory complications suggest that cannabis use is a significant risk factor in aortic surgery. Our study showed that young, healthy patients with prolonged cannabis use might be at a higher risk of requiring more emergency surgeries due to their background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.