ArticleIn silico pharmacology2025
In-silico-based lead optimization of hit compounds targeting mitotic kinesin Eg5 for cancer management.
Article in In silico pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- De Novo Molecular Design and Bioactivity Prediction of Novel Hexahydroquinolines asBioinformatics and biology insights · 2026Article
- Reflecting on Dunbar's numbers: Individual differences in energy allocation to personal relationships.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lead optimization is vital for turning hit compounds into therapeutic drugs. This study builds upon a prior in silico research, where the hit compounds had better binding affinity and stability compared to a reference drug. Using a genetic algorithm, 12,500 analogs of the top compounds from the prior study were generated. Virtual screening was done using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model. Top analogs, selected based on pChembL values below 6.000nM, underwent molecular docking targeting Human Eg5. The top five analogs from this study (Compound 9794, Compound 8592, Compound 9786, Compound 2744, and Compound 3246) demonstrated strong binding energies and interactions with key amino acids (GLU 116, GLU 117, and ARG 119). MMGBSA analysis revealed comparable affinities to the co-crystallized ligand, suggesting the top analogs' potential as Human Eg5 inhibitors. Induced fit docking highlighted Compound 9786's superior efficacy. Quantum Polarized Ligand Docking indicated promising scores for Compounds 8592 and 9786. ADMET predictions offered insights into pharmacological properties, with all compounds predicted to be HIA-positive and non-carcinogenic. Further MD simulation study confirms the stability of the top compounds in the active site of Eg5. This study shows the significance of integrated strategies in drug design. However, in vitro and in vivo studies should be conducted for these promising candidates to confirm their efficacy as Eg5 inhibitors. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40203-024-00300-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.