ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2025
Evaluating the Equivalency of Teletesting and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Measures of Reading Achievement in a Clinically Referred Sample.
Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to build an evidence base to support teletesting as an equivalent modality for standardized neuropsychological assessment. As such, the purpose of this study was twofold. First, this study evaluated teletesting equivalency of standardized reading achievement measures during COVID-19 in children ages 6-16. Further, to examine the impact of COVID-19 on reading, achievement scores were compared in two samples of children assessed before and during COVID-19.
methodsParticipants were referred for testing at an outpatient neuropsychology clinic at an urban, academic medical center. Aim one compared assessments administered in-person (n = 1039) versus teletesting (n = 283). A two one-sided test (TOST) was used to determine equivalency. Aim two compared children seen pre-COVID-19 (n = 2125) and during COVID-19 (n = 1322) including a subsample of elementary school-aged children. One-way analyses of covariance were employed, with insurance type and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition Matrix Reasoning (as a proxy for nonverbal IQ) included as covariates.
resultsResults showed equivalence in reading achievement scores administered via teletesting compared to in-person during COVID-19. For aim two, Nonsense Word Decoding scores were significantly higher for the COVID-19 group compared to the pre-COVID-19 group (p = 0.03). No other significant differences in reading scores were found between groups, including no differences among a subsample of elementary school-aged children (ages 6-10; all ps > 0.05).
conclusionsThis provides additional support for teletesting equivalency and suggests the negative impact of COVID-19 on foundational reading skills is less than predicted in a clinically referred sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.