Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39780524›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025

Fractional CO

Qiang Ji, Lili Luo, Jun Ni, Xiaolan Pu, He Qiu, Dongmei Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07592468 (Intraoperative Fractionated CO₂ Laser Treatment of Wound Edges During Mohs Micrographic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07592468 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Intraoperative Fractionated CO₂ Laser Treatment of Wound Edges During Mohs Micrographic Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor Research InstituteRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsWound EdgesArmsCO2 Fractionated Laser, Non CO2 Laser Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fractional COLasers in medical science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiang JiDepartment of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2751-8654
Lili LuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jun NiDepartment of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaolan PuDepartment of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
He QiuDepartment of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0115-8910
Dongmei WuDepartment of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical scars with textural changes can be disfiguring and uncomfortable for patients. Various laser therapies have shown promise in softening and flattening these scars. Therefore, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of fractional CO

objectiveThis study aims to present evidence from controlled trials investigating the efficacy of ablative carbon dioxide fractional laser in treating surgical scars. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature search of Medline (via PubMed), Ovid, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant trials was conducted before March 2024. After assessing for inclusion, data extraction was performed using Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study criteria (PICOS). Quality, validity, and risk of bias were assessed using the RevMan5.3 risk of bias assessment tool.

resultsA total of 14 controlled trials involving 492 participants or postsurgical scars were included in the system review and meta-analysis. Both in RCT and non-RCT settings, fractional CO

conclusionThe systematic review and meta-analysis provide robust support for the efficacy of fractional CO

Indexed as

CicatrixLasers, GasHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment Outcomefractional carbon dioxide laserscarssurgery

Identifiers

PMID39780524
PMCPMC11711943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.