Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39780394›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025

Contribution of Travelers to

Deepali Savargaonkar, Bina Srivastava, Chander Prakash Yadav, Mrigendra Pal Singh, Anup Anvikar, Amit Sharma, Himmat Singh, Abhinav Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Deepali SavargaonkarICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India, 91 9205059972.ORCID 0009-0003-6824-6373
Bina SrivastavaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India, 91 9205059972.ORCID 0009-0007-1507-3447
Chander Prakash YadavICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7531-6307
Mrigendra Pal SinghICMR-National Institute for Research in Tribal Health, Jabalpur, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4336-4413
Anup AnvikarICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India, 91 9205059972.ORCID 0000-0001-8455-6054
Amit SharmaInternational Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3305-0034
Himmat Singh *ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India, 91 9205059972.ORCID 0000-0001-7682-651X
Abhinav Sinha *ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India, 91 9205059972.ORCID 0000-0003-1900-7686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: India is committed to malaria elimination by the year 2030. According to the classification of malaria endemicity, the National Capital Territory of Delhi falls under category 1, with an annual parasite incidence of <1, and was targeted for elimination by 2022. Among others, population movement across states is one of the key challenges for malaria control, as it can result in imported malaria, thus introducing local transmission in an area nearing elimination. Objective: This descriptive study attempts to assess the contribution of such imported Plasmodium vivax cases to the malaria burden in South West Delhi (SWD). Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out at the fever clinic of the Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Malaria Research in SWD from January 2017 to December 2019. Demographic and travel history data were recorded for all P vivax confirmed malaria cases diagnosed at the fever clinic. Vector and fever surveys along with reactive case detection were conducted in SWD and Bulandshahr district of Uttar Pradesh, 1 of the 6 geographical sources for a high number of imported malaria cases. Results: A total of 355 P vivax malaria cases were reported during the study period. The proportion of imported cases was 63% (n=222). Of these, 96% (n=213) of cases were from Uttar Pradesh. The distribution of malaria cases revealed that imported cases were significantly associated with travel during the transmission season compared with that in the nontransmission season. Entomological and fever surveys and reactive case detection carried out in areas visited by imported P vivax malaria cases showed the presence of adults and larvae of Anopheles species and P vivax parasitemia. Conclusions: Population movement is a key challenge for malaria elimination. Although additional P vivax infections and vector mosquitoes were detected at places visited by the imported malaria cases, the inability to detect the parasite in mosquitoes and the possibility of relapses associated with P vivax limit the significance of malaria associated with the travel. However, there remains a need to address migration malaria to prevent the introduction and re-establishment of malaria in areas with very low or 0 indigenous cases.

Indexed as

Malaria, VivaxTravelAdolescentAdultAnimalsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPlasmodium vivaxYoung Adulteliminationimported malariaIndiamalariaPlasmodium vivaxpopulation movementtransmission

Identifiers

PMID39780394
PMCPMC11734761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.