ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2025
Prevention and Management of Infectious Complications in Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Survey Assessment of Current Practices Across Children's Oncology Group Institutions.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWhile clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for pediatric oncology infection prophylaxis and management exist, few data describe actual management occurring at pediatric oncology centers.
methodsAn electronic survey querying infection management practices in nontransplant pediatric oncology patients was iteratively created by the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Cancer Control and Supportive Care Infectious Diseases Subcommittee and sent to leaders at all COG institutions, limiting each site to one response to represent their institution.
resultsThe response rate was 57% (129/227 institutions). Many sites reported utilizing COG-endorsed CPGs for antibacterial (76%) and antifungal prophylaxis (74%), and fever and neutropenia (FN, 64%). Most institutions reported using antimicrobial prophylaxis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (88% antibacterial, 100% antifungal) and relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (82% antibacterial, 95% antifungal). Definitions of fever, phagocyte recovery, and antibiotic duration in febrile patients varied. Most institutions administer empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics for nonneutropenic fever, although 14% reported withholding antibiotics based on initial clinical status or risk stratification tools. Most respondents reported (70%) admitting FN patients for at least 48 h, however 15% have low-risk FN protocols allowing outpatient management. FN patients remain admitted on antibiotics through count recovery in 50% of institutions, whereas the others employed various early discharge/early antibiotic discontinuation strategies.
conclusionsThere is often consistency but also substantial variability in reported antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies and management of patients with fever and represents an opportunity for implementation studies to standardize application of CPG recommendations and randomized trials to advance evidence where knowledge gaps exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.