Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39780283›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2025

Antihypertensive strategies for the prevention of secondary stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ChunQi Wang, Ling Feng, ShuangYan Tu, Dan Wei, Rui Wang, ZhiQiang Deng, YiPing Luo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Developmental trajectories of medication adherence and predictors of latent classes in patients with ischemic stroke].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Headache After Stroke: An Update for the Clinician.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

ChunQi WangDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. 1148882393@qq.com.
Ling FengDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. fengling216@163.com.
ShuangYan TuDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Dan WeiDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
ZhiQiang DengDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
YiPing LuoWest China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke is an important contributor to disability and death globally. Hypertension is a main risk factor for recurrent stroke in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Higher systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure at admission are independently associated with the risk of stroke recurrence. Therefore, lowering blood pressure is recommended by guidelines to prevent the recurrence of stroke.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases was conducted through January 12, 2024. The search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antihypertensive drugs with control measures (placebo or no treatment) or standard blood pressure control (SBPC) with intensive blood pressure control (IBPC) for recurrent stroke prevention. Primary outcomes included overall and subtype stroke recurrence rates, fatal and non-fatal strokes, cardiovascular deaths, and myocardial infarctions (MIs). Secondary outcomes comprised non-fatal MIs and all-cause mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random or fixed-effect models in Stata 15.0.

resultsThe analysis included 19 RCTs encompassing 72,048 patients. Twelve studies (n = 53,971) evaluated antihypertensive drugs against placebo or no treatment, while seven studies (n = 18,077) compared SBPC with IBPC. Antihypertensive therapy demonstrated significant risk reductions compared to placebo or no treatment for recurrent stroke (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97), cardiovascular deaths (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97), and MIs (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96). IBPC showed superior outcomes compared to SBPC, with significant reductions in recurrent stroke (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.98), cardiovascular deaths (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.91), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-0.95).

conclusionIn stroke patients, antihypertensive therapy demonstrates significant protective effects against stroke recurrence, cardiovascular deaths, and MIs compared to placebo or no treatment. Additionally, IBPC provides enhanced protection against stroke recurrence, cardiovascular deaths, and all-cause mortality compared to SBPC.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionSecondary PreventionStrokeBlood PressureHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntihypertensive AgentsAntihypertensive therapyBlood pressure managementHypertensionMeta-analysisRecurrent strokeSecondary preventionStroke

Identifiers

PMID39780283
PMCPMC11715515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.