ArticleBMC health services research2025
Development of a pandemic-related core set of quality indicators for quality and patient safety in University Hospitals in Germany.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Even the COVID-19 pandemic didn´t change anything: insights from a trend study on the cooperation of general practitioners and occupational health physicians in Germany.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Core Measure Set for Patient Safety in Perioperative Care: A Clinical Practice-Oriented Consensus Study.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Patient Safety Indicator Sets: Prioritization, Decision-Making Considering Healthcare Resilience, and Implementation Success.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic entailed a global health crisis, significantly affecting medical service delivery in Germany as well as elsewhere. While intensive care capacities were overloaded by COVID cases, not only elective cases but also non-COVID cases requiring urgent treatment unexpectedly decreased, potentially leading to a deterioration in health outcomes. However, these developments were only uncovered retrospectively. Especially university hospitals, which were meant to take on a central coordinating role, did not have detailed information on expected healthcare utilization, available resources and capacities, and the quality of medical care. The experience of compromised healthcare and a lack of monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic made it clear that healthcare systems should be better prepared. Therefore, the aim of this work was to develop a set of indicators suited to detect undesirable developments concerning the provision of inpatient healthcare. MATERIAL &
methodsThe study employed a literature review, online surveys, expert interviews, and a multistep evaluation process to develop a core set of quality indicators (QIs) suitable for assessing the resilience of university hospitals during pandemics. This initial set of indicators was refined through consultations with a) quality and risk management officials from German university hospitals via an online survey and b) a diverse panel of experts.
resultsThe comprehensive evaluation identified two primary strands: organizational/management indicators (Strand A, 60 indicators) and disease-specific clinical quality and patient safety indicators (Strand B, 20 indicators for critical conditions like stroke, myocardial infarction, and cancer.) Three additional indicators were added after a final expert panel meeting, resulting in a final set of 83 indicators. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThe developed QIs mark a significant advancement in the operational preparedness of university hospitals for pandemics. The study contributes to quality management in healthcare during pandemics by creating the basis for a structured approach to pandemic preparedness and response. This unique set of QIs within the German context presents an opportunity for establishing quality improvement, underscoring the importance of a robust, adaptable quality management framework as a basis for safeguarding against future health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.