ArticleBMC public health2025
A predictive model for depression risk in individuals with hypertension: evidence from NHANES 2007-2020.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prediction model for depression risk in middle-aged and elderly patients with metabolic syndrome: a nomogram and interpretable machine learning approach based on CHARLS.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- U-shaped association between average daily sleep duration and depression among individuals with hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2017-2020.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHypertension increases the prevalence of depression to a certain extent and identification and diagnosis of depression frequently pose challenges for clinicians. The study aimed to construct and validate a scoring model predicting the prevalence of depression with hypertension.
methods6124 individuals with hypertension were utilized from the 2007 to 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database (NHANES), including 645 subjects that were assessed to have depressive symptoms, 390 in the development group and 255 in the validation group. Univariable and multivariable analyses were applied to analyze the impact of each parameter on depression with hypertension, resulting in establishment of a predictive model. Finally, the discriminability, calibration ability, and clinical efficacy of the model were verified for both the derivation set and validation set.
resultsTen variables comprised this model: age, gender, race, poverty to income ratio (PIR), smoke, sleep hours, exercise, diabetes, congestive heart failure, stroke. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the derivation and validating sets was 0.790 and 0.723, respectively, which showed excellent discriminability. The model also fitted well with the actual prevalence of depression with hypertension in calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the depression model was practically useful.
conclusionThis scoring model may provide an additional perspective for evaluating the underlying risk factors of depression for hypertensive individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.