ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Cervical length of preoperative cervical cerclage prognostic impacted the effect of cervical insufficiency.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between maternal cervical Ureaplasma urealyticum colonization and adverse perinatal outcomes: a prospective multicenter cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to analyze the impact of preoperative cervical length before cervical cerclage on the extension of gestational days in patients with various diagnostic types of cervical insufficiency, including obstetric history-based diagnosis, ultrasound-based diagnosis, and physical examination-based diagnosis.
methods168 patients were segregated into four categories based on cervical length: 0-0.4 cm, 0.5-1.4 cm, 1.5-2.4 cm, and ≥ 2.5 cm. Kaplan-Meier, linear regression curve and Cox regression analyses were used, with a focus on clinical variables, particularly cervical length and the duration of extension after cervical cerclage.
resultsThe length of the cervix prior to cervical cerclage correlated with the prognosis of 168 postoperative patients by linear regression analysis. When delivery beyond 28 or 34 weeks was set as the primary prognostic indicator, univariate Cox analysis showed that postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level was identified as a risk factor for gestational age extension in cervical cerclage patients. Longer cervical length was identified as a protective factor for overall gestational age extension in cervical cerclage patients. In addition, the obstetrical-history diagnosis group had a better prognosis compared to the emergency cerclage group, which had a worse prognosis compared to the ultrasound-based diagnosis group. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis of all patients revealed a statistically significant impact of different cervical lengths on the gestational age of delivery (P < 0.001). However, in the physical examination-based diagnosis group, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated a statistically significant impact of different cervical lengths on gestational age at delivery (P = 0.006).
conclusionLonger preoperative cervical length was associated with better outcomes in terms of gestational prolongation and newborn survival after cervical cerclage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.