ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Hybrid natural language processing tool for semantic annotation of medical texts in Spanish.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer-based relation extraction and concept normalization using an annotated clinical trials corpus.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Automating Case-Based Learning in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Validation of a Locally Deployed Large Language Model.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNatural language processing (NLP) enables the extraction of information embedded within unstructured texts, such as clinical case reports and trial eligibility criteria. By identifying relevant medical concepts, NLP facilitates the generation of structured and actionable data, supporting complex tasks like cohort identification and the analysis of clinical records. To accomplish those tasks, we introduce a deep learning-based and lexicon-based named entity recognition (NER) tool for texts in Spanish. It performs medical NER and normalization, medication information extraction and detection of temporal entities, negation and speculation, and temporality or experiencer attributes (Age, Contraindicated, Negated, Speculated, Hypothetical, Future, Family_member, Patient and Other). We built the tool with a dedicated lexicon and rules adapted from NegEx and HeidelTime. Using these resources, we annotated a corpus of 1200 texts, with high inter-annotator agreement (average F1 = 0.841% ± 0.045 for entities, and average F1 = 0.881% ± 0.032 for attributes). We used this corpus to train Transformer-based models (RoBERTa-based models, mBERT and mDeBERTa). We integrated them with the dictionary-based system in a hybrid tool, and distribute the models via the Hugging Face hub. For an internal validation, we used a held-out test set and conducted an error analysis. For an external validation, eight medical professionals evaluated the system by revising the annotation of 200 new texts not used in development.
resultsIn the internal validation, the models yielded F1 values up to 0.915. In the external validation with 100 clinical trials, the tool achieved an average F1 score of 0.858 (± 0.032); and in 100 anonymized clinical cases, it achieved an average F1 score of 0.910 (± 0.019).
conclusionsThe tool is available at https://claramed.csic.es/medspaner . We also release the code ( https://github.com/lcampillos/medspaner ) and the annotated corpus to train the models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.