ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
HCV and HBV genotypes: vital in the progression of HCV/ HBV co-infection.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seroepidemiological Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Virus Coinfection: A Large-Scale Retrospective Cohort Study in Istanbul.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of Treatment Response in Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Coinfected Patients Using a Leakage-Proof, Internally Validated Logistic Regression Pipeline.Advances in virology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViral hepatitis is the major contributor to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies indicated that the co-infection of hepatitis C and hepatitis B virus also prompts liver damage progression. Therefore, in the present study, the prevalence of HCV-HBV co-infection and the impact of HCV-HBV co-infection on the progression of liver damage was evaluated amongst the HCV-infected patients in Pakistan.
methodsIn this study 2500 HCV-positive patients were recruited from Pakistan. The presence and prevalence of HCV and HBV was confirmed through ELISA and nested PCR. To determine the liver damage due to viral infection levels of ALT, ALP, and total bilirubin were also determined. Diagnostic history of patients was thoroughly documented through serological tests and liver biopsy reports. Viral genotypes and viral loads were determined through multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and time PCR, respectively.
resultsThe study outcomes showed that 12.5% of the HCV-infected patients were co-infected with HBV. Co-infection development was more common in females than in males, and females were at a higher risk of developing the infection (p-value = < 0.0001, OR = 2.437). Despite the variation among different age groups, there was no significant difference in co-infection prevalence. HCV genotype 3a was found to be most prevalent while in HBV genotype D was found to be prevalent among the patients. The HCV patients frequently developed co-infection with HBV genotype D. It was also determined that viral load for HBV genotype D was higher compared to non-D genotypes while for HCV viral load was higher in non-3a genotypes.
conclusionsThis study evaluated the prevalence of HCV and HBV co-infection among HCV-positive patients, revealing that 12.5% patients were co-infected with HBV. Co-infection was more common in females, who had a higher risk of developing it. The study also revealed that HBV genotype D was the most prevalent in co-infected patients, with no significant age-related differences in co-infection rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.