ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Awareness of cardiovascular disease risk and care received among Australian women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular risk prediction in women with gestational diabetes using risk assessment tools: a scoping review.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
- Perceived Risk Perception of Future Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in the Postpartum Period.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Awareness, Perceptions, Willingness, and Feasibility of mHealth Apps Among People Living With Epilepsy: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Co-designing an intervention for cardiovascular disease risk assessment and management after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in primary care.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), including chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Current research suggests that general practitioners are unaware of women's HDP history, and although ideally placed to follow-up with these women, there is limited understanding of current CVD prevention practices in women after HDP. Additionally, preeclampsia confers a higher CVD risk compared to other types of HDP, and Australian research suggests that lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a higher incidence of both HDP and CVD. Therefore, the aim of the analysis was to investigate awareness of CVD risk and care received from health professionals among women with a history of HDP and examine differences between type of HDP and SES.
methodsAnalysis of a cross-sectional survey of 293 Australian women with a history of HDP (from 2017 onwards). Data were analysed using basic descriptive statistics. To assess differences in HDP type and SES, one-way ANOVA was used to assess continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsMost women with a history of HDP were unaware of their increased CVD risk (68%). Women with a history of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension or preeclampsia were more aware of CVD risk compared to those with chronic hypertension (p = 0.02). Regardless of HDP type or SES, women post-HDP were less likely to receive assessment and management of lifestyle CVD risk factors compared to blood pressure. Most women felt supported in managing stress and mental health, but not for managing body weight, smoking and sleep.
conclusionsWomen with a history of HDP are unaware of their increased CVD risk and are not receiving recommended CVD preventative care, irrespective of HDP type and/or SES. Findings should be used to inform development of tailored CVD prevention interventions in the primary care setting for women following HDP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.