Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39780036›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2025

Integration of machine learning and genome-wide association study to explore the genomic prediction accuracy of agronomic trait in oats (Avena sativa L.).

Jinghan Peng, Xiong Lei, Tianqi Liu, Yi Xiong, Jiqiang Wu, Yanli Xiong, Minghong You, Junming Zhao, Jian Zhang, Xiao Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jinghan PengCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5680-2729
Xiong LeiSichuan Academy of Grassland Science, Chengdu, China.
Tianqi LiuCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yi XiongCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Jiqiang WuCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yanli XiongCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Minghong YouSichuan Academy of Grassland Science, Chengdu, China.
Junming ZhaoCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Jian ZhangSichuan Provincial Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Development, Chengdu, China.
Xiao MaCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

Cooperation project of provincial college, and provincial school 2023YFSY0012Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System CARS-34-45National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271753Sichuan Grassland Science Research Institute Basic Research Operating Expenses for Research Institutes 2024JDKY0032Sichuan Province regional innovation cooperation project 2022YFQ0076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has garnered significant attention for its potential to enhance the accuracy of genomic predictions (GPs) in various economic crops with the use of complete genomic information. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are widely used to pinpoint trait-related causal variant loci in genomes. However, the simultaneous integration of both methods for crop genome prediction necessitates further research. In this study, we integrated ML and GWAS to assess the efficiency of GP for seven key agronomic traits in 195 oat (Avena sativa) cultivars from major oat-growing regions around the world. A total of 94 trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms were identified through the GWAS study. GP studies were conducted using the classical model genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and six ML models. GBLUP performed poorly in predicting all traits except flag leaf width, while none of the ML models consistently provided the best prediction accuracy across all traits. The prediction accuracy of the GWAS-derived markers was better than that of the use of genome-wide markers, and plant height had the highest prediction rate at 100 GWAS-derived markers, and the rest of the traits for which more markers were required. These results play an important role in advancing the use of GP in small oat breeding programs by optimizing the prediction rate of GP and reducing the number of markers, confirming that high prediction rates can be achieved with smaller datasets.

Indexed as

AvenaGenome-Wide Association StudyMachine LearningPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantGenomicsPhenotypePlant BreedingQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID39780036
PMCPMC11711298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.