ArticleThe plant genome2025
Integration of machine learning and genome-wide association study to explore the genomic prediction accuracy of agronomic trait in oats (Avena sativa L.).
Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering the genetic architecture of biomass yield and related traits in Southern US oat germplasm using genome-wide association study.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of low-density high-throughput marker platform and easy-to-measure traits for genomic prediction of biomass yield in oat (Avena sativa L.).The plant genome · 2026Article
- Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dissecting the genetic and phenotypic basis of salinity tolerance in mungbean: insights from multi-stage phenotyping, GWAS and genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Integration of machine learning and genome-wide association study to explore the genomic prediction accuracy of agronomic trait in oats (Avena sativa L.).The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has garnered significant attention for its potential to enhance the accuracy of genomic predictions (GPs) in various economic crops with the use of complete genomic information. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are widely used to pinpoint trait-related causal variant loci in genomes. However, the simultaneous integration of both methods for crop genome prediction necessitates further research. In this study, we integrated ML and GWAS to assess the efficiency of GP for seven key agronomic traits in 195 oat (Avena sativa) cultivars from major oat-growing regions around the world. A total of 94 trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms were identified through the GWAS study. GP studies were conducted using the classical model genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and six ML models. GBLUP performed poorly in predicting all traits except flag leaf width, while none of the ML models consistently provided the best prediction accuracy across all traits. The prediction accuracy of the GWAS-derived markers was better than that of the use of genome-wide markers, and plant height had the highest prediction rate at 100 GWAS-derived markers, and the rest of the traits for which more markers were required. These results play an important role in advancing the use of GP in small oat breeding programs by optimizing the prediction rate of GP and reducing the number of markers, confirming that high prediction rates can be achieved with smaller datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.