ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2025
Multiomic quantification of the KRAS mutation dosage improves the preoperative prediction of survival and recurrence in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Updates in the diagnosis and management of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most cancer mutation profiling studies are laboratory-based and lack direct clinical application. For clinical use, it is necessary to focus on key genes and integrate them with relevant clinical variables. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the dosage of the KRAS G12 mutation, a key pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) variant and to investigate the biological mechanism of the prognosis associated with the dosage of the KRAS G12 mutation. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 193 surgically treated patients with PDAC between 2009 and 2016. RNA, whole-exome, and KRAS-targeted sequencing data were used to estimate the dosage of the KRAS G12 mutant. Our prognostic scoring system included the mutation dosage from targeted sequencing ( > 0.195, 1 point), maximal tumor diameter at preoperative imaging ( > 20 mm, 1 point), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels ( > 150 U/mL, 1 point). The KRAS mutation dosage exhibited comparable performance with clinical variables for survival prediction. High KRAS mutation dosages activated the cell cycle, leading to high mutation rates and poor prognosis. According to prognostic scoring systems that integrate mutation dosage with clinical factors, patients with 0 points had superior median overall survival of 97.0 months and 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of 95.8%, 70.8%, and 66.4%, respectively. In contrast, patients with 3 points had worse median overall survival of only 16.0 months and 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of 65.2%, 8.7%, and 8.7%, respectively. The incorporation of the KRAS G12 mutation dosage variable into prognostic scoring systems can improve clinical variable-based survival prediction, highlighting the feasibility of an integrated scoring system with clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.