Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779941›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2025

Mapping the developmental trajectory of human astrocytes reveals divergence in glioblastoma.

Caitlin Sojka, Hsiao-Lin V Wang, Tarun N Bhatia, Yangping Li, Pankaj Chopra, Anson Sing, Anna Voss, Alexia King, Feng Wang, Kevin Joseph and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Organoids glimpse: the nexus for diverse tumor heterogeneity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Caitlin SojkaDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hsiao-Lin V WangDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1889-4239
Tarun N BhatiaDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3046-6659
Yangping LiDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-5826
Pankaj ChopraDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anson SingDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anna VossDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7888-2638
Alexia KingDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Feng WangDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kevin JosephDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-8736
Vidhya M RaviDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0062-2099
Jeffrey OlsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9968-681X
Kimberly HoangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Edjah NduomDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Victor G CorcesDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bing YaoDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3205-8130
Steven A SloanDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. sasloan@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7769-7684

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES019776 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Lance A Waller · 2013 to 2026
$22.6M
Mechanisms of transgenerational epigenetic inheritanceR01ES027859 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Victor G. Corces · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
Molecular Drivers of Human GliogenesisR01MH125956 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SLOAN, STEVEN A · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Shared mechanisms of astrocyte maturation in development and glioblastomaR01NS123562 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SPANGLE, JENNIFER MARIE · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Mechanisms of bisphenol A induced epigenomic alterations in the mammalian germlineF32ES031827 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, HSIAO-LIN V. · 2020 to 2022
$225k
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (Brain & Behavior Research Foundation) NARSAD Young Investigator GrantNIEHS NIH HHS F32 ES031827NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES019776NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027859NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125956NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123562Sontag Foundation Distinguished Scholars AwardU.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) ES027859U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) ES031827U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) MH125956U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) NS123562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is defined by heterogeneous and resilient cell populations that closely reflect neurodevelopmental cell types. Although it is clear that GBM echoes early and immature cell states, identifying the specific developmental programmes disrupted in these tumours has been hindered by a lack of high-resolution trajectories of glial and neuronal lineages. Here we delineate the course of human astrocyte maturation to uncover discrete developmental stages and attributes mirrored by GBM. We generated a transcriptomic and epigenomic map of human astrocyte maturation using cortical organoids maintained in culture for nearly 2 years. Through this approach, we chronicled a multiphase developmental process. Our time course of human astrocyte maturation includes a molecularly distinct intermediate period that serves as a lineage commitment checkpoint upstream of mature quiescence. This intermediate stage acts as a site of developmental deviation separating IDH-wild-type neoplastic astrocyte-lineage cells from quiescent astrocyte populations. Interestingly, IDH1-mutant tumour astrocyte-lineage cells are the exception to this developmental perturbation, where immature properties are suppressed as a result of D-2-hydroxyglutarate oncometabolite exposure. We propose that this defiance is a consequence of IDH1-mutant-associated epigenetic dysregulation, and we identified biased DNA hydroxymethylation (5hmC) in maturation genes as a possible mechanism. Together, this study illustrates a distinct cellular state aberration in GBM astrocyte-lineage cells and presents developmental targets for experimental and therapeutic exploration.

Indexed as

AstrocytesBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaCell DifferentiationCell LineageDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationOrganoidsTranscriptomeIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID39779941
PMCPMC12210326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.