Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779879›Full record

ReviewNature microbiology2025

A decade of advances in human gut microbiome-derived biotherapeutics.

Alena L Pribyl, Philip Hugenholtz, Matthew A Cooper

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alena L PribylMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7625-5259
Philip HugenholtzThe University of Queensland, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. p.hugenholtz@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-7925
Matthew A CooperSitala Bio, Cambridge, UK. m.cooper@sitala.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3147-3460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiome science has evolved rapidly in the past decade, with high-profile publications suggesting that the gut microbiome is a causal determinant of human health. This has led to the emergence of microbiome-focused biotechnology companies and pharmaceutical company investment in the research and development of gut-derived therapeutics. Despite the early promise of this field, the first generation of microbiome-derived therapeutics (faecal microbiota products) have only recently been approved for clinical use. Next-generation therapies based on readily culturable and as-yet-unculturable colonic bacterial species (with the latter estimated to comprise 63% of all detected species) have not yet progressed to pivotal phase 3 trials. This reflects the many challenges involved in developing a new class of drugs in an evolving field. Here we discuss the evolution of the live biotherapeutics field over the past decade, from the development of first-generation products to the emergence of rationally designed second- and third-generation live biotherapeutics. Finally, we present our outlook for the future of this field.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesHumansProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID39779879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.