ArticleScientific reports2025
Novel metabolic prognostic score for predicting survival in patients with cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Curative-Intent Resection: A Multicenter Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Multimorbidity profile among cancer-related hospitalization events in younger and older patients: a large-scale nationwide cross-sectional study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Metabolic syndrome as a prognostic factor in advanced pancreatic cancer: a predictive model and chemotherapy evaluation.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Predictive significance of the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet score for radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a respective comparative study with dosimetric parameters.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is a fatal disease with a high global prevalence and is associated with an increased incidence of metabolic disorders. This study aimed to develop a novel metabolic prognostic system to evaluate the overall metabolic disorder burden in cancer patients and its relationship with their prognosis. The patients in this study were enrolled from the Investigation on Nutrition Status and Clinical Outcome of Common Cancers (INSCOC) project. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis was used to screen for indicators of metabolic disorders. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent association between indicators of metabolic disorders and mortality in patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the survival of patients with varying burdens of metabolic disorders. Finally, nomogram prognostic models and corresponding calculators were constructed and evaluated using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Five of the 19 hematological indexes, including hemoglobin, neutrophils, direct bilirubin, albumin, and globulin, were selected as the evaluation indicators of metabolic disorder burden and independent risk factors for prognosis in cancer patients. Patients with a higher metabolic disorder burden had poorer survival rates. The AUC of the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival of the prognostic nomogram was 0.678, 0.664, and 0.650, respectively. DCA and calibration curves indicated that the clinical benefit rate of metabolic disorder burden prognostic markers was high. Patients with a higher metabolic disorder burden had poorer survival rates. The nomogram and corresponding calculator can accurately evaluate the metabolic disorder burden and predict the prognosis of patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.