Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779836›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Endothelial tip-cell position, filopodia formation and biomechanics require BMPR2 expression and signaling.

Christian Hiepen, Mounir Benamar, Jorge Barrasa-Fano, Mar Condor, Mustafa Ilhan, Juliane Münch, Nurcan Hastar, Yannic Kerkhoff, Gregory S Harms, Thorsten Mielke and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantifying cell traction forces at the single-fiber scale in 3D: An approach based on deformable photopolymerized fiber arrays.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christian Hiepen *Freie Universität Berlin, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Thielallee 63, 14195, Berlin, Germany. christian.hiepen@w-hs.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-6496
Mounir Benamar *Freie Universität Berlin, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Thielallee 63, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2268-2774
Jorge Barrasa-FanoKU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics section, Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300 C, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-0457
Mar CondorKU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics section, Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300 C, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Mustafa IlhanFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Thielallee 63, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Juliane MünchUniversität Potsdam, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Karl-Liebknecht Strasse 24-25, 14476, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5910-6569
Nurcan HastarFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Thielallee 63, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Yannic KerkhoffFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Thielallee 63, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8126-2082
Gregory S HarmsUniversitätsmedizin, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Cell Biology Unit, Imaging Core Facility and the Research Center for Immune Intervention, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Thorsten MielkeMax-Planck-Institute for Molecular Genetics, Microscopy & Cryo-Electron Microscopy, Ihnestraße 63-73, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Benjamin KoenigFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Thielallee 63, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan BlockFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Thielallee 63, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Oliver RocksCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Systemic Cell Dynamics, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Salim Abdelilah-SeyfriedUniversität Potsdam, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Karl-Liebknecht Strasse 24-25, 14476, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-3841
Hans Van OosterwyckKU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics section, Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300 C, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2142-9717
Petra KnausFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Thielallee 63, 14195, Berlin, Germany. Petra.knaus@fu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2492-1667

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BL1514/1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BSIOMax-Planck-Gesellschaft (Max Planck Society) IMPRS-BACSonnenfeld Stiftung (Sonnenfeld Foundation) fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood vessel formation relies on biochemical and mechanical signals, particularly during sprouting angiogenesis when endothelial tip cells (TCs) guide sprouting through filopodia formation. The contribution of BMP receptors in defining tip-cell characteristics is poorly understood. Our study combines genetic, biochemical, and molecular methods together with 3D traction force microscopy, which reveals an essential role of BMPR2 for actin-driven filopodia formation and mechanical properties of endothelial cells (ECs). Targeting of Bmpr2 reduced sprouting angiogenesis in zebrafish and BMPR2-deficient human ECs formed fewer filopodia, affecting cell migration and actomyosin localization. Spheroid assays revealed a reduced sprouting of BMPR2-deficient ECs in fibrin gels. Even more strikingly, in mosaic spheroids, BMPR2-deficient ECs failed to acquire tip-cell positions. Yet, 3D traction force microscopy revealed that these distinct cell behaviors of BMPR2-deficient tip cells cannot be explained by differences in force-induced matrix deformations, even though these cells adopted distinct cone-shaped morphologies. Notably, BMPR2 positively regulates local CDC42 activity at the plasma membrane to promote filopodia formation. Our findings reveal that BMPR2 functions as a nexus integrating biochemical and biomechanical processes crucial for TCs during angiogenesis.

Indexed as

Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptors, Type IINeovascularization, PhysiologicPseudopodiaSignal TransductionZebrafishAnimalsBiomechanical Phenomenacdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCell MovementEndothelial CellsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsZebrafish ProteinsBMPR2 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein Receptors, Type IIcdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39779836
PMCPMC11711618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.