Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779808›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prognostic significance of albumin corrected anion gap in patients with acute pancreatitis: a novel perspective.

Jianjun Wang, Pei Yang, Xintao Zeng, Sirui Chen, Xi Chen, Lan Deng, Ruizi Shi, Chuan Qin, Huiwen Luo, Jianping Gong and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Albumin-corrected anion gap and risk of mortality among US adults.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jianjun Wang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Pei Yang *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Xintao Zeng *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Sirui ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Lan DengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Ruizi ShiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Chuan QinDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Huiwen LuoNHC Key Laboratory of Nuclear Technology Medical Transformation, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Jianping GongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China. gongjianping11@126.com.
Hua LuoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China. 940450750@qq.com.
Decai WangNHC Key Laboratory of Nuclear Technology Medical Transformation, School of Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China. decaiwang_2020@163.com.

Funding

Health Commission of Sichuan Province Medical Science and Technology Program Grant no.24QNMP028Incubation Project of Mianyang Central Hospital Grant no.2022FH010National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Grant no.82400758NHC Key Laboratory of Nuclear Technology Medical Transformation (Mianyang Central Hospital) Grant no.2023HYX032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to explore the relationship between the albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) and short- and long-term all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a retrospective analysis utilizing data extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database. This study sought to investigate the correlation between ACAG and ACM among patients diagnosed with AP across various disease stages. R statistical software was used to identify the optimal thresholds for ACAG. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to assess the association between ACAG and short- and long-term ACM of AP. The predictive ability, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of ACAG for short- and long-term ACM in AP were investigated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Subgroup analyses were also conducted. A cohort comprising 605 participants was included in this study. The ideal threshold for ACAG identified by R statistical software was 21.5. Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that there was an independent association between patients with AP with ACAG ≥ 21.5 and ACM at 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 90, and 180 days and 1 year before and after adjustment for confounders. Survival curves demonstrated that patients with ACAG ≥ 21.5 had lower survival rates at 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 90, and 180 days and 1 year. In addition, ACAG showed superior performance, with a larger AUC than the anion gap, albumin, and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment at 3, 7, 10, 14, 28, 90, and 180 days and 1 year. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant interaction between ACAG and any subgroups Elevated levels of ACAG were found to be associated with increased short- and long-term ACM in patients with AP, and ACAG may be an independent predictor of ACM at different disease stages.

Indexed as

Acid-Base EquilibriumPancreatitisAcute DiseaseAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSerum AlbuminSerum AlbuminAcute pancreatitisAlbumin-corrected anion gapAll-cause mortalityIntensive care unitMIMIC-IV

Identifiers

PMID39779808
PMCPMC11711654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.