Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779807›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Insights into mungbean defense response to Cercospora leaf spot based on transcriptome analysis.

Sukanya Inthaisong, Pakpoom Boonchuen, Tana Jaichopsanthia, Pongpan Songwattana, Apinya Khairum, Witsarut Chueakhunthod, Akkawat Tharapreuksapong, Panlada Tittabutr, Neung Teaumroong, Piyada Alisha Tantasawat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Distribution and Occurrence of Cercospora Leaf Spot of Mungbean (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sukanya InthaisongSchool of Crop Production Technology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Pakpoom BoonchuenSchool of Biotechnology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Tana JaichopsanthiaSchool of Crop Production Technology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Pongpan SongwattanaInstitute of Research and Development, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Apinya KhairumDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ubon Ratchathani University, Warin Chamrap, Ubon Ratchathani, 34190, Thailand.
Witsarut ChueakhunthodSchool of Crop Production Technology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Akkawat TharapreuksapongCenter for Scientific and Technological Equipment, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Panlada TittabutrSchool of Biotechnology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Neung TeaumroongSchool of Biotechnology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Piyada Alisha TantasawatSchool of Crop Production Technology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand. piyada@sut.ac.th.

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand N41A640211National Science Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) 179319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) cultivars are susceptible to Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) caused by Cercospora canescens Ellis & Martin, and it is necessary to explore resistance sources and understand resistance mechanisms. However, the CLS resistance mechanisms have not yet been explored. The response to CLS revealed significantly different disease severity scores in both mungbean genotypes. Hypersensitive response (HR) started to appear at 2 days after inoculation (DAI) in SUPER5 but was never observed in CN84-1. SUPER5 exhibited fewer and smaller lesions than CN84-1 during CLS infection, resulting in SUPER5 being resistant while CN84-1 was susceptible to CLS. In this study, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis was used to unravel the mechanisms of resistance to CLS in a resistant line (SUPER5) and a susceptible variety (CN84-1) upon CLS infection. A total of 9510 DEGs including 4615 up-regulated and 4895 down-regulated genes were revealed. Of these 3242 and 1027 genes were uniquely up-regulated only in the SUPER5 and CN84-1, respectively, while 2902 and 734 genes were down-regulated only in SUPER5 and CN84-1, respectively. The 843 DEGs were enriched in biological processes mainly associated with plant defense responses, defense response to fungus, protein phosphorylation and response to chitin in Gene Ontology (GO) terms analysis. KEGG pathway analysis showed that these genes were represented in plant-pathogen interaction, the MAPK signaling pathway, plant hormone signal transduction, and cell wall component biosynthesis in response to the CLS infection specifically in SUPER5. In addition, the qRT-PCR was used to analyze the expression pattern of 22 candidate DEGs belonging to pathogenesis related (PR) proteins, resistance (R) proteins, transcription factors, hypersensitive response (HR), and the essential genes involved in cell wall activity during CLS-infected V. radiata. It was found that the expression of these genes was consistent with the RNA-seq analysis, showing a highly significant correlation with a coefficient of 0.7163 (p < 0.01). The co-expression network illustrated the interactions among these genes, which were involved in multiple functions related to the defense response. Interestingly, the ones encoding PR-2, thaumatin, peroxidase, defensin, RPM1, pectinesterase, chalcone synthase, auxin efflux carrier, and transcription factors (Pti1, Pti5, Pti6 and WRKY40) were highly significantly up-regulated in SUPER5 but not in CN84-1 upon CLS infection, suggesting that they might be involved in the CLS resistance mechanisms. Moreover, SUPER5 was found to have higher β-1,3-glucanase and chitinase activity levels than CN84-1. Our findings contribute to an understanding of the CLS resistance mechanisms and may advocate the development of more effective disease management approaches.

Indexed as

CercosporaDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesVignaPlant ProteinsTranscriptomePlant ProteinsCercospora leaf spotDefense response genesResistance mechanismsTranscriptome analysisVigna radiata

Identifiers

PMID39779807
PMCPMC11711198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.