ArticleScientific reports2025
Blood metal levels predict digestive tract cancer risk using machine learning in a U.S. cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Evidence for Genotype-Specific Optimal Blood Lead Levels for Cancer Risk:International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Predicting the Regulatory Dynamics of AML Disease Progression from Longitudinal Multi-Modal Clinical Data.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Association between blood lead and gastrointestinal cancers among US adults: A cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2003-2016.Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnvironmental metal exposure has been implicated in the development of digestive tract cancers, although the specific associations remain poorly defined. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between blood metal levels and the risk of digestive tract cancers among U.S. adults.
methodsData from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2018, including 13,467 participants aged 20 years and older, were analyzed. Nine blood metals were measured. Multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic spline models, and subgroup analyses were employed to assess the associations between metal levels and cancer risk. Additionally, a Random Forest (RF) model was used for cancer risk prediction.
resultsAmong the participants, 9 had esophagus cancer (EC), 11 had gastric cancer (GC), and 83 had colorectal cancer (CRC). Compared to healthy controls, EC patients exhibited significantly higher blood levels of potassium (K, 4.40 vs. 4.00 mmol/L), cadmium (Cd, 12.46 vs. 2.49 µg/L), and lead (Pb, 0.09 vs. 0.05 µg/L). GC patients had elevated Pb levels (0.08 vs. 0.05 µg/L), while CRC patients showed higher concentrations of Cd (3.11 vs. 2.49 µg/L) and Pb (0.06 vs. 0.04 µg/L). Logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between higher K (odds ratio [OR] = 7.58, 95% CI: 3.48-16.48, P < 0.0001), Cd (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.08, P < 0.0001), and Pb (OR = 7.60, 95% CI: 3.26-17.72, P < 0.0001) levels and EC risk. Pb was also significantly associated with GC (OR = 5.26, 95% CI: 2.11-13.10, P < 0.001). The RF model showed an accuracy of 76% in predicting cancer risk, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis highlighting Cd and iron (Fe) as key contributors.
conclusionsThe study reveals a positive association between certain blood metals and digestive tract cancer risk, suggesting that limiting exposure to these metals may serve as a potential preventive measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.