ArticleScientific reports2025
Uncertainty-aware diabetic retinopathy detection using deep learning enhanced by Bayesian approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Responsible artificial intelligence in medical imaging: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Uncertainty-aware and interpretable deep learning in cytopathology: toward trustworthy AI-powered diagnostics.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Uncertainty-Aware AI-Assisted Diabetic Retinopathy Grading from Fundus Images with Ordinal Conformal Prediction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A gated task-attentive multi-task network for unified retinal image analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Sickle Cell Retinopathy Imaging: Current Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Enhancing fundus image analysis for diabetic retinopathy using CheXNet with CBAM and Grad-CAM visualization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A novel diffuse liver nodule detector via integrating semantic edge features and probabilistic uncertainty modeling.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Detection of diabetic retinopathy using multicolor image by multimodal network incorporating information bottleneck (MNIIB).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI-driven virtual cell models in preclinical research: technical pathways, validation mechanisms, and clinical translation potential.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Graph-enhanced deep learning for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis: A quality-aware and uncertainty-driven approach.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Residual bayesian attention networks for uncertainty quantification in regression tasks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-Modal AI for Multi-Label Retinal Disease Prediction Using OCT and Fundus Images: A Hybrid Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing skin lesion classification: a CNN approach with human baseline comparison.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- LIU-NET: lightweight Inception U-Net for efficient brain tumor segmentation from multimodal 3D MRI images.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning-based medical image analysis has shown strong potential in disease categorization, segmentation, detection, and even prediction. However, in high-stakes and complex domains like healthcare, the opaque nature of these models makes it challenging to trust predictions, particularly in uncertain cases. This sort of uncertainty can be crucial in medical image analysis; diabetic retinopathy is an example where even slight errors without an indication of confidence can have adverse impacts. Traditional deep learning models rely on single-point predictions, limiting their ability to provide uncertainty measures essential for robust clinical decision-making. To solve this issue, Bayesian approximation approaches have evolved and are gaining market traction. In this work, we implemented a transfer learning approach, building upon the DenseNet-121 convolutional neural network to detect diabetic retinopathy, followed by Bayesian extensions to the trained model. Bayesian approximation techniques, including Monte Carlo Dropout, Mean Field Variational Inference, and Deterministic Inference, were applied to represent the posterior predictive distribution, allowing us to evaluate uncertainty in model predictions. Our experiments on a combined dataset (APTOS 2019 + DDR) with pre-processed images showed that the Bayesian-augmented DenseNet-121 outperforms state-of-the-art models in test accuracy, achieving 97.68% for the Monte Carlo Dropout model, 94.23% for Mean Field Variational Inference, and 91.44% for the Deterministic model. We also measure how certain the predictions are, using an entropy and a standard deviation metric for each approach. We also evaluated the model using both AUC and accuracy scores at multiple data retention levels. In addition to overall performance boosts, these results highlight that Bayesian deep learning does not only improve classification accuracy in the detection of diabetic retinopathy but also reveals beneficial insights about how uncertainty estimation can help build more trustworthy clinical decision-making solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.