Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779778›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Uncertainty-aware diabetic retinopathy detection using deep learning enhanced by Bayesian approaches.

Mohsin Akram, Muhammad Adnan, Syed Farooq Ali, Jameel Ahmad, Amr Yousef, Tagrid Abdullah N Alshalali, Zaffar Ahmed Shaikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohsin AkramDepartment of Computer Science, School of Systems and Technology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, 54770, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0005-6198-3762
Muhammad AdnanDepartment of Computer Science, School of Systems and Technology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, 54770, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-6374-9682
Syed Farooq AliDepartment of Computer Science, School of Systems and Technology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, 54770, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3943-903X
Jameel AhmadDepartment of Computer Science, School of Systems and Technology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, 54770, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4283-4946
Amr YousefElectrical Engineering Department, University of Business and Technology, Jeddah, 21448, Saudi Arabia. a.yousef@ubt.edu.sa.ORCID 0000-0003-0875-6462
Tagrid Abdullah N AlshalaliDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Zaffar Ahmed ShaikhDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University Lyari, Karachi, 75660, Pakistan. zashaikh@bbsul.edu.pk.ORCID 0000-0003-0323-2061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning-based medical image analysis has shown strong potential in disease categorization, segmentation, detection, and even prediction. However, in high-stakes and complex domains like healthcare, the opaque nature of these models makes it challenging to trust predictions, particularly in uncertain cases. This sort of uncertainty can be crucial in medical image analysis; diabetic retinopathy is an example where even slight errors without an indication of confidence can have adverse impacts. Traditional deep learning models rely on single-point predictions, limiting their ability to provide uncertainty measures essential for robust clinical decision-making. To solve this issue, Bayesian approximation approaches have evolved and are gaining market traction. In this work, we implemented a transfer learning approach, building upon the DenseNet-121 convolutional neural network to detect diabetic retinopathy, followed by Bayesian extensions to the trained model. Bayesian approximation techniques, including Monte Carlo Dropout, Mean Field Variational Inference, and Deterministic Inference, were applied to represent the posterior predictive distribution, allowing us to evaluate uncertainty in model predictions. Our experiments on a combined dataset (APTOS 2019 + DDR) with pre-processed images showed that the Bayesian-augmented DenseNet-121 outperforms state-of-the-art models in test accuracy, achieving 97.68% for the Monte Carlo Dropout model, 94.23% for Mean Field Variational Inference, and 91.44% for the Deterministic model. We also measure how certain the predictions are, using an entropy and a standard deviation metric for each approach. We also evaluated the model using both AUC and accuracy scores at multiple data retention levels. In addition to overall performance boosts, these results highlight that Bayesian deep learning does not only improve classification accuracy in the detection of diabetic retinopathy but also reveals beneficial insights about how uncertainty estimation can help build more trustworthy clinical decision-making solutions.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremDeep LearningDiabetic RetinopathyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID39779778
PMCPMC11711487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.