ArticleScientific reports2025
Boosting skin cancer diagnosis accuracy with ensemble approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal Uncertainty-Decomposed Ensemble Learning for Confounding-Aware Skin Cancer Detection in Dermoscopic Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A robust stacked ensemble strategy with multi-optimizer CNN models for skin cancer classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DermaScanAI an explainable hybrid deep learning framework for automated skin lesion classification using dual attention and metadata fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- R3MV: a novel reliable system architecture for skin cancer classification using progressive heterogeneous multiblock model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interpretable multimodal fusion for skin lesion classification using dermoscopic images and patient metadata.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Improving Skin Lesion Diagnosis: A Hybrid Approach Using Orthogonal Combination of Local Binary Pattern Features and Ensemble Learning for Diagnostic Accuracy.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-stage knowledge distillation with layer fusion-based deep learning approach for skin cancer classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning assisted LDPC decoding for 5G IoT networks in fading environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An innovative Squid Game Optimizer for enhanced channel estimation and massive MIMO detection using dilated adaptive RNNs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging data analytics to revolutionize cybersecurity with machine learning and deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improving CNN predictive accuracy in COVID-19 health analytics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning approach for automated hMPV classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hybrid AI and semiconductor approaches for power quality improvement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- SkinEHDLF a hybrid deep learning approach for accurate skin cancer classification in complex systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- COVID-19 health data prediction: a critical evaluation of CNN-based approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin cancer is common and deadly, hence a correct diagnosis at an early age is essential. Effective therapy depends on precise classification of the several skin cancer forms, each with special traits. Because dermoscopy and other sophisticated imaging methods produce detailed lesion images, early detection has been enhanced. It's still difficult to analyze the images to differentiate benign from malignant tumors, though. Better predictive modeling methods are needed since the diagnostic procedures used now frequently produce inaccurate and inconsistent results. In dermatology, Machine learning (ML) models are becoming essential for the automatic detection and classification of skin cancer lesions from image data. With the ensemble model, which mix several ML approaches to take use of their advantages and lessen their disadvantages, this work seeks to improve skin cancer predictions. We introduce a new method, the Max Voting method, for optimization of skin cancer classification. On the HAM10000 and ISIC 2018 datasets, we trained and assessed three distinct ML models: Random Forest (RF), Multi-layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Overall performance was increased by the combined predictions made with the Max Voting technique. Moreover, feature vectors that were optimally produced from image data by a Genetic Algorithm (GA) were given to the ML models. We demonstrate that the Max Voting method greatly improves predictive performance, reaching an accuracy of 94.70% and producing the best results for F1-measure, recall, and precision. The most dependable and robust approach turned out to be Max Voting, which combines the benefits of numerous pre-trained ML models to provide a new and efficient method for classifying skin cancer lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.