Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779762›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Artificial intelligence for body composition assessment focusing on sarcopenia.

Sachiyo Onishi, Takamichi Kuwahara, Masahiro Tajika, Tsutomu Tanaka, Keisaku Yamada, Masahito Shimizu, Yasumasa Niwa, Rui Yamaguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sachiyo Onishi *Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Takamichi Kuwahara *Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan. kuwa_tak@aichi-cc.jp.
Masahiro Tajika *Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Tsutomu Tanaka *Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Keisaku Yamada *Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Masahito Shimizu *Department of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gifu University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Gifu, Japan.
Yasumasa Niwa *Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Rui Yamaguchi *Division of Cancer Systems Biology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to address the limitations of conventional methods for measuring skeletal muscle mass for sarcopenia diagnosis by introducing an artificial intelligence (AI) system for direct computed tomography (CT) analysis. The primary focus was on enhancing simplicity, reproducibility, and convenience, and assessing the accuracy and speed of AI compared with conventional methods. A cohort of 3096 cases undergoing CT imaging up to the third lumbar (L3) level between 2011 and 2021 were included. Random division into preprocessing and sarcopenia cohorts was performed, with further random splits into training and validation cohorts for BMI_AI and Body_AI creation. Sarcopenia_AI utilizes the Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI), which is calculated as (total skeletal muscle area at L3)/(height)

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBody CompositionSarcopeniaTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligence (AI)Body composition assessmentSarcopenia diagnosisSkeletal muscle mass

Identifiers

PMID39779762
PMCPMC11711400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.